rotatelogs.com

LCD monitors and their current dominance should come as no surprise to anyone who’s familiar with these liquid crystal display units and especially when they’re compared to old-style CRT (cathode ray tube) monitors of just several short years ago. CRT monitors were once the industry standard for personal computers for many years, though that has now completely changed in favor of LCD models.

At its most basic, a CRT monitor is nothing more than a TV without the ability to capture television signals and then convert them to moving pictures. All of the other technology is there, in fact. Over the last decade — since flat panel LCD technology became increasingly common — the CRT has become ever rarer. By 2006, LCDs had completely taken over the desktop computer market.

Again, this should come as a surprise, considering how much the LCD unit has going for it and its ability to match up well with desktop computers. CRTs cannot compete, it seems with LCDs on a number of fronts, including in weight, bulk, durability and energy efficiency, among others. They’re far more compact and lightweight than the typical CRT monitor and they’re able to take much more abuse.

These days, the LCD monitor is so ubiquitous when it comes to the standard display provided with any PC or Mac that there’s no such computer being offered anymore with a CRT monitor. And this has been so since at least 2006. Consequently, as liquid crystal displays have become more common, their prices have dropped appreciably (they used to be quite expensive just several short years back).

As has already been pointed out, liquid crystal display monitors are much less hefty in terms of weight and bulk than similarly-sized (screen size) CRT models. Ponder for a moment how much a 17 or’-inch CRT monitor would weigh, and then think about how light the same size monitor is in LCD form. Also, think on how much easier an LCD model is to move about when compared to old-style CRT.

In terms of being “green, ” an LCD monitor is far more energy efficient — using much less power — than a CRT monitor. This is a superior point in the LCD’s favor, it must be said, and the fact that an LCD unit is far more able to take a blow than a CRT monitor is yet another point. There have been instances when a liquid crystal display monitor has been dropped or hit by something and has kept right on going.

When lined up next to each other, it’s hard to imagine how much more different an LCD monitor can be in comparison to a cathode ray tube monitor of similar dimensions. LCDs are lighter in weight and very nicely priced, plus they’re low-power consumers and they can take quite a beating if they have to. Given all of this, it’s not hard to see why these monitors have come to such prominence these days.

Matthew Kerridge is an expert in electronic products. If you would like more information about types of LCD monitors or are looking for a reputable monitor retailer please visit http://www.ebuyer.com